Search for: "Adams v. Cato"
Results 1 - 20
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2009, 2:03 pm
The Cato Institute and Professor Randy Barnett (Georgetown) filed an amicus brief in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm
Levy was adamant the Kochs not be allowed to control half the board. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm
Cato Institute,... [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:19 pm
Adam C. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:43 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:22 am
Adam Schaeffer of the Cato Institute writes in All of Your Money Belongs to the State that the 9th circuit thinks just that: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in an appeal of a 9th Circuit decision, Winn v Garriott, a challenge to one of Arizona’s education tax credit programs. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:03 am
Case over harsh IRS handling of lost-in-mail filing reflects worst practices on judicial deference [William Yeatman, Yale Journal on Regulation on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Baldwin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm
Early coverage comes from Adam Liptak and Michael D. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:02 pm
Ilya Shapiro (of the Cato Institute) has an interesting post discussing the upcoming Supreme Court argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:17 pm
I’ve got a new post up at Cato at Liberty explaining why the American Electric Power v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:24 am
Games-Perez and U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
” In The National Law Journal, Arthur Bryant argues that, although the Court’s ruling last Term in the class-action case Spokeo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 9:15 pm
Eugene Volokh and the Cato Institute amicus program hardly ever take opposite sides of a First Amendment case, but it’s happening in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:30 am
Agency interpretive letters are the wrong way to enact new federal law [Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald on Cato amicus in school bathroom case, Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:20 am
The Supreme Court is hearing argument today in the case of Nelson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
Additional commentary comes from Walter Olson for Cato; Howard Wasserman for PrawfsBlawg; Jonathan H. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:48 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Zubik v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
In Tyson Foods v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 12:55 pm
This morning the Court released a unanimous opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am
Epic Systems v. [read post]
