Search for: "Adams v. Kelly et al" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2008, 10:57 am
Rosenthal's e-troubles began last December when e-mails he sent and received in the latter half of 2007 were disclosed as part of discovery in a federal civil rights suit, Erik Adam Ibarra, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
Read… I am no expert in sentencing, probation, rehabilitation of offenders et al… but…surely.. we can, as a vaguely civilised nation.. do a bit better than this? [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
CAFOM Habitat International S.A et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by New Books Script
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By December 2008, Newsweek reported that the size of the market amounted to US$600 trillion[v], an exponential increase when compared with the size the market had in 1993 and 2006. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP)   New Zealand Haka war dance now covered by intellectual property (Techdirt)   Nigeria Nigerian musicians want payment for music played on airplanes (Afro-IP)   Poland PARIS-DAKAR seeks to invalidate world trade mark registration for DAKAR by Polish company by the same name (Class 46)   South Africa Delays at the SA registry favour trade mark proprietor: Golden Fried Chicken (Pty) Ltd v Soulsa CC (Afro-IP)   Spain Exhaustion of trade… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Catherine Banet, et. al., eds., Resilience in Energy, Infrastructure, and Natural Resources Law:  Examining Legal Pathways for Sustainability in Times of Disruption (2022). [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]