Search for: "Adams v. Russell"
Results 161 - 180
of 386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
The people of Arizona are the winners today along with the Arizona State Legislature, Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce, and Arizona House Speaker Kirk Adams,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:05 pm
By Brian Russell Nick v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s opinion in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
” Additional commentary on Rhines’ cert petition comes from Adam Romero and Ilan Meyer at Jurist. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
For The New York Times, Adam Cohen reviews Joan Biskupic’s “assiduously reported and briskly written biography” of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
” Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Sveen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
In Ayestas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” At The Weekly Standard, Adam White explains that “the principles underlying [Justice Neil] Gorsuch’s opinion” in Sessions v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:49 am
Adams (March 25): Whether a Delaware law that limits the number of judges affiliated with a particular party to a “bare majority” on the state’s three highest courts violates the Constitution U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Adame v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:22 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner.] [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:09 am
” At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner explains how the Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
” In a column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses Tanzin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
” At The Yale Law Journal, Adam Steinman offers a framework for analyzing the issue in Hughes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
Yesterday a unanimous court ruled in Thacker v. [read post]
