Search for: "Adams v. Unknown"
Results 1 - 20
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal "A convicted person seeking compensation after the reversal of his conviction on the basis of new or newly discovered facts establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there was a miscarriage of justice had to show that the facts were unknown to him during the trial or appeal. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm
LJY v The Person(s) Unknown responsible for the demand for money contained in a letter received by the claimant’s representatives on 5 December 2017. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:45 am
R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 1291; [2009] WLR (D) 350 “A convicted person seeking compensation as a result of reversal of his conviction on the basis of new or newly discovered facts establishing beyond reasonable doubt that there had been a miscarriage of justice had to show that the facts had been unknown to the convicted person during the trial process or an in-time appeal. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm
In the case of Middleton & Anor v Person Or Persons Unknown [2016] EWHC 2354 (QB) Pippa Middleton, the sister of the Duchess of Cambridge, successfully sought the continuation of an interim privacy injunction and the expansion of its terms against person(s) unknown. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
In addition to Sunderland Housing, in LJY v Persons Unknown [2018] EMLR 19 the claimant, who had been targeted for an attempt at blackmail, accepted that he was concerned about his reputation. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Adams, William Bryan "Bill" v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
More details of this case can be found in the case of Adamitis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm
Combine extremely wealthy claimant, the subject matter of his sex life, a freely entered into confidentiality agreement, the absence of a genuine public interest, a blackmail threat and Adam Speker, the barrister who is fast-becoming the doyen of urgent applications involving some, or all, of these issues (think NPV v QEL & ZED [2018] EWHC 703 (QB) (see our blog here), PML v Persons Unknown [2018] EWHC 838 (QB) or Clarkson… [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 15 July 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Blackledge v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 1994 (QB). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:19 pm
Adams, Misjoinder and the Mysterious Opinion John L. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Guy Vassall-Adams QC is a member of Matrix Chambers, practising the field of media and information law. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 5:03 am
However, in 2006, in Jones v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:39 pm
"No Religious Preference," "Unknown," and "Other" are among the choices available.In Adams v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Adam Liptak has an article in the New York Times on the January 11th oral argument scheduled in Briscoe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:11 am
As the Ninth Circuit explained recently in Dennis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:57 pm
There is a serious problem with that analysis: the California Supreme Court held in Adams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:27 am
(NAACP v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm
But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know.That's just a side benefit. [read post]