Search for: "Adkins v. Adkins" Results 121 - 140 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am by Christine Corcos
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
This article, which is based upon a review of all of the surviving docket books from that Term, considers what those sources can teach us about the cases comprising what some have called the “switch-in-time”: West Coast Hotel Co v Parrish, which upheld Washington State’s minimum wage law for women and overruled Adkins v Children’s Hospital; the Labor Board Cases, which upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act; and the Social… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
" Because of this, the plaintiff's claim, and future plaintiff's claims, are not subject to any rigorous legal standard other than a jury's opinion.Judge Adkins noted that claimants and the businesses they sue will "have virtually no standard for differentiating acceptable and unacceptable conduct in terms of dealing with people's differences in health status. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:23 am by Wystan Ackerman
The Seventh Circuit, however, held last week that such an injunction violated the Anti-Injunction Act, in Adkins v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:23 am by Wystan Ackerman
The Seventh Circuit, however, held last week that such an injunction violated the Anti-Injunction Act, in Adkins v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:44 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The 12th bellwether test trial in the continuing 3M earplugs litigation gets underway today in the case of Wilkerson v. 3M Co. (7:20-cv-00035). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 2:57 pm
Adkins Held: Where two parties enter into a contract for the lease and development of real estate and one party subsequently breaches that contract, evidence of post-breach market conditions is not admissible to prove lost profits if the parties did not contemplate the market conditions when they contracted. [read post]