Search for: "Adoption of Barnett"
Results 61 - 80
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Posted by Jonathan Barnett (USC Gould School of Law), on Monday, September 25, 2023 Editor's Note: Jonathan Barnett is a Professor of Law at USC Gould School of Law. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Randy Barnett is Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory at Georgetown Law. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm
The examiners recommended standard units of 320 acres, the same as the rules for the Newark, East (Barnett Shale) Field. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:07 am
Barnett also argues that even if the original Ninth bound only the federal government, the same set of rights protected by the Ninth were applied against the states in the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:50 am
In none of its briefs to date has the government adopted Orin’s approach. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm
But the validity of a position does not depend on people’s motives for adopting it. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
(Orin Kerr) In their posts below, both Jonathan Adler and Randy Barnett suggest that it’s okay for the proposed activity/inactivity distinction to be unclear because the “actus reus” distinction has been unclear for a long time and the world hasn’t ended. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
(Randy Barnett) William Howell, the Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, and I have an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal making the case for a constitutional amendment giving 2/3 of state legislatures the power to repeal any federal law or regulation. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Among the signers are six of the Volokh Conspirators — Jonathan Adler, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, David Post, Sasha Volokh, and myself. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm
Perhaps Justice Scalia will someday extend this theory to include the power to regulate inactivity (or to mandate that persons engage in economic activity) when doing so is essential to a broader regulatory scheme, and it will be adopted by five justices. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
If Rawls is right, Professor Barnett took the wrong side in the Obamacare case. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted–as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 7:18 am
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the phased in abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted as well as the abolition of slavery in the Northwest Territory. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:26 am
The adoption of the Declaration, and the public affirmation of its principles, led directly to the abolition of slavery in half of the United States by the time the Constitution was drafted just 11 years later. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
[(Note the citation to, among others, our own Randy Barnett.)] [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm
(Randy Barnett) If the Supreme Court invalidates the individual insurance mandate, it need not call into question any other law that has ever been passed in the history of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
Lee Optical adopted hypothetical “rational basis” scrutiny that all laws can survive. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:15 am
Thomas Yahola, Pete Beaver, Johnnie Greene, David Nichols, Dode Barnett, Joyce Deere, Frank Coachman, Mark Randolph, Lucian Tiger, David Hill, Robert Hufft, James Jennings and Adam Jones co-sponsored the legislation. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:57 am
The Court could adopt one without adopting the other. [read post]
