Search for: "Adoption of Bowling v. Bowling" Results 1 - 20 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 4:45 am by Steve Lombardi
compensation commissioner misapplied the business-related benefits test adopted by our supreme court in Briar Cliff College v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
compensation commissioner misapplied the business-related benefits test adopted by our supreme court in Briar Cliff College v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:08 pm
George:In response to your inquiry about funding for facilities, security, and operating expenses for the Regional Counsel Office in Miami, the FY 2007-2008 Adopted Budget does not include funding for a facility and/or operating expenses for such an office.The letter references FACDL v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:57 pm
B219352, (2nd Dist., Div. 4, August 31, 2010) Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:00 am
The granted issue is "WHETHER (1) THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN ADOPTING A TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER APPELLANT'S ASSERTION OF HIS RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT WAS SCRUPULOUSLY HONORED THAT DIFFERS FROM THE TESTS SET FORTH BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN MICHIGAN v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:21 am
On Monday I attended the oral argument before the Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Liquor is available at Smitty City West, a convenience store; Pender Lanes, a bowling alley; three bars (Shriebs, Welsh’s and the Other Side); a veteran’s club; and Twin Creeks Golf Club. [read post]