Search for: "Adoption of McDonald" Results 61 - 80 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2022, 8:07 am by Simon Lester
On the economic front, the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944 between the US and Britain led shortly thereafter to the formation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (the GATT, and as of 1995 the World Trade Organization), where all countries would trade with each other under a common set of ground rules, with some dispensations for developing countries adopted in the ensuing two decades, and the creation of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Instead, Bruen suggests that Heller and McDonald point to "at least two metrics: how and why the regulations burden a law-abiding citizen's right to armed self-defense. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
[Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns] This post describes and analyzes nineteenth century state statutes on Bowie knives. [read post]
General Manager of Member Services for the Law Society Glenda Mcdonald commented, “While more than 50 per cent of those who enter the profession are women, this percentage is not represented by the number of people who eventually go on to hold senior positions. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:40 pm by Anna Bower
The courthouse here is a quaint brick building just off Main Street, which offers a handful of antique shops, a local grocer’s, a McDonald’s, and the coffee shop where I hunkered down to write this dispatch. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
  For a summary of the arguments, and the SNP’s written case, please refer to the excellent case preview drafted by CMS Senior Associate, Alan McDonald. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: When Derek Chauvin knelt on George Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes, and when Jason Van Dyke fired sixteen rounds at Laquan McDonald who was walking away from the responding officers, were Chauvin and Van Dyke acting exclusively of their own volition, or were their actions indicative of a deeper, systemic issue? [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:02 am by CMS
In this post, Alan McDonald, Senior Associate in the Disputes team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the Reference by the Lord Advocate in relation to the Scottish Independence Referendum Bill. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am by David Kopel
The interest balancing was conducted by the people themselves when they adopted the Second Amendment. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[6]Those competing visions reflexively drive the interpretive approaches that dictate which history and which traditions to adopt—in Dobbs, a supermajority adopted an originalism that somehow excluded the history of slavery and its ongoing consequences, as well as the Constitution’s Reconstruction Amendments meant to address it, as Professor Michelle Goodwin has powerfully pointed out.[7]And both sides reveal competing accounts of the otherwise agreed-upon common… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Phelan J in Tallon v Director of Public Prosecutions [2022] IEHC 322 (31 May 2022) is a recent and important judgment on the scope of the free speech rights protected by Article 40.6.1(i) and Article 40.3.1 of the Constitution. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:05 am by JB
Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence recites two paragraphs and a footnote from Heller and McDonald that list a set of “longstanding” firearm regulations that are deemed constitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:46 am by Randy E. Barnett
However, at the extremes it can be quite obvious, as I think it is with New York's law and the D.C. and Chicago gun bans the court held to be unconstitutional in Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm by Randy Barnett
Is this an “undue burden” test of the sort that had previously been adopted in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . [read post]