Search for: "Affirmed Housing Group"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 7:18 am
According to witness accounts provided to the BBC, there was a gunfight after a group of roughly 20 attackers wearing army uniforms broke into the house. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:03 am
It once again affirmed the importance of academic exchange and why calls for boycotts are so wrongheaded. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:05 am
The bill provides further that in any enforcement action, there is an affirmative defense if the developer, deployer or other person discovers and cures the violation. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
The major companies that provide these so called “pay in four” products, such as Affirm Holdings Inc., Klarna Bank AB and Block Inc. [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:00 am
Democrats in the state House pushed for a vote to repeal the1864 law. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed, first holding that the statutory language requires particularized evidence that “relate[s] to articles that are all protected by a particular patent, not to a group of articles variously protected by different patents. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Constitutional law has, at best, failed to meaningfully constrain—and, at worst, has affirmatively legitimated—the war on drugs and its monstrous human toll. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:30 am
A group of faculty and staff members at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill asked the administration for amnesty for student protesters who were recently arrested and suspended. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:47 am
The House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations announced that it will hold a hearing on May 8 at 10:00 a.m. [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm
The materials listed several examples of revenue rulings regarding housing and employment. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
(For discussion of why “shouting down,” even though expressive, is not protected from government prohibition, see this recent column by one of us.)Calling physical blockage peaceful because it does not involve overt and affirmative violent assaults on third parties does nothing to alter its lack of constitutional status. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
He subsequently invited me and the editor of The Outlook to a reception he had at his house on Mt. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:25 pm
In a social media post, the Jewish Community Relations Council Bay Area affirmed the proteste [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
Affirmed. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”So MAGA Mike has had his moment, going to Columbia, and confronting his own bogeyman group of leftists. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:18 am
At its core, NAGPRA embodies principles of sovereignty, self-determination, and cultural autonomy, affirming the inherent rights of Indigenous peoples to their ancestral lands, sacred objects, and human remains. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:09 pm
A Department of Housing and Urban Development rule proposing a framework to ensure that federal funding is used in a systematic way to affirmatively support the goals of the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
The appellate court affirmed this decision, relaying the “legislative exemption,”[8] and the California Supreme Court denied subsequent review. [read post]
