Search for: "Agency of Natural Resources v. Persons"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 3:31 pm
Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:18 am
The following could be extracted from the CJEU’s ruling, inter alia: the cost must not exceed the financial resources of the person concerned nor appear to be objectively unreasonable; the court could consider “whether the claimant has a reasonable prospect of success, the importance of what is at stake . . . , the complexity of the relevant law and procedure, the potentially frivolous nature of the claim . . . . [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and few questions surrounding Chevron have generated as much debate as the fate of so-called jurisdictional questions: May agencies receive deference when interpreting the scope of their own regulatory authority? [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:56 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., mandated that courts defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of ambiguous statutes it administers, provided the interpretation is reasonable. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:10 am
In University of Connecticut v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:06 am
Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:29 pm
Permanent injunctions do not bar the rule itself, but the enforcement of the rule against a particular person for a particular violation of the constitution or statute, as was the case in Newland v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 pm
This includes the key High Court decisions in National Resource Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67 (‘NRDC’) and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35 (‘Myriad’), in which the Court proceeded on the basis – as the Full Court put it at [116] – that ‘human agency was required in the development of the invention in suit’. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
[o]btains or records identifying information of a person which would assist in accessing the resources of that person or any other person. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
The Court also left intact its landmark decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 12:12 pm
Wildlife Resources Agency, decided yesterday by Chancellor Jerri Bryant, Judge Russell Parkes, and Chief Judge Donald Parish (Tenn. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:53 pm
Kaleikini's request was denied by the Chairperson of the Board of Land and Natural Resources, Department of Land and Natural Resources ("DLNR"). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has held that a person who can demonstrate greater enjoyment of a natural resource than the general public has standing under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) to challenge an action by a governmental entity which may threaten such a natural resource. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has held that a person who can demonstrate greater enjoyment of a natural resource than the general public has standing under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) to challenge an action by a governmental entity which may threaten such a natural resource. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:51 am
., Inc. v Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (“Chevron”), in the coming term the Supreme Court will hear argument on and consider, in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm
In University of Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
