Search for: "Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Third, we explain why existing disclosures in this area provide support for, rather than reason to oppose, standardized, mandatory climate-related disclosures. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:24 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Standard Oil Co., 318 U.S. 724, 730, 735 (1943); see also Vaughan, 369 U.S. at 532 (ambiguities and doubts must be resolved in favor of the seaman); Wood v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Standard Oil Co. of N.J., 318 U.S. 724 (1943): Unlike men employed in service on land, the seaman, when he finishes his day’s work, is neither relieved of obligations to his employer nor wholly free to dispose of his leisure as he sees fit. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:59 pm
To the extent plaintiffs have some claim that survives Aguilar, their attempts to plead that claim are "too broad and amorphous" to satisfy the pleading standards set forth in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Sun Oil Co. (1943), federal courts should abstain from resolving a constitutional challenge to South Carolina's anti-gambling laws. [read post]