Search for: "Aiken v. Aiken"
Results 101 - 120
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The Court of Appeal (Aikens, Mummery and Elias LJJ) upheld this argument in February 2010. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:46 am
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:29 am
By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:52 am
District Court Judge James V. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:31 am
Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1975). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:48 am
Miller, an associate at the firm, discuss Aiken v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:17 am
Today the paper runs three stories, or perhaps that should be two stories and a commentary:The first story concerns the criticisms of social workers in the recent EH v London Borough of Greenwich & Ors case (in which Lord Justice Wall said that social workers "are perceived by many as the arrogant and enthusiastic removers of children from their parents into an unsatisfactory care system"), and in a case involving Devon County Council, in which Lord Justice Aikens… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 am
Cardinale
APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTEnvironmental Law
Free With Registration: Environmental Hazard Suit Against GE Proceeds; Issue on When Possible Contamination Known
Aiken v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
See Aikens v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:11 pm
Craig Thorner v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
" Crue v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
(A California case, Aikens v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
In the Guardian case, the Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Jackson and Aikens LJJ) analysed the case law on “criminal cause or matter” – to decide whether it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:08 am
In the first case (Blackley v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
Judge Aiken was wrong to revive this case, and now the Ninth Circuit has killed it for good. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
For examples, see FedEx v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
The issues for the Supreme Court concern the proper approach to be taken to an Article 13(b) defence in child abduction cases; and the interaction between the domestic approach to the Convention and that of the European Court of Human Rights, following the ECHR case of Neulinger and Shuruk v. [read post]
