Search for: "Ainsworth v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 5:20 am
" Ainsworth v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
There is no formal definition of works of artistic craftsmanship, but the published guidance has produced suggestions (pg 7) as to how the courts will approach this type of work based on the cases of Hensher (George) Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd[1975] RPC 31, HL and Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another [2012] 1 AC 208:• It is not enough for a work (such as a piece of furniture) to look attractive to qualify as a work of artistic… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:05 am
Earlier today judgment was handed down in the long-awaited Accident Line Protect (ALP) Test Cases (reported as Tankard v John Fredricks Plastics Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1375. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:13 am
Ainsworth Technologies Inc. and Rasanen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Blocking measures have expanded to 39 countries in recent years, with the United States remaining the key absentee. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
Id. at 2792-93; see also Ainsworth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
Also it is important to point out that Star Wars, or more specifically a storm trooper helmet, was the key point of contention in the regularly cited case of Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth (2011). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am
– Dallas 2014, no pet) Houston 14th Court: Ainsworth v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:45 am
– Dallas 2014, no pet) Houston 14th Court: Ainsworth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
In the most high profile intellectual property dispute to reach the Supreme Court to date, the justices were asked in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39, [2011] All ER (D) 257 (Jul) to consider who owns the rights to the storm trooper helmets from the Star Wars films: Mr Ainsworth, a UK designer, or the director George Lucas’ company, Lucasfilm. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39There are two parts to this decision. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
No - regardless of how it's displayedThe second was Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (the "Star Wars case" covered on the IPKat here) concerned the question of whether a stormtroopers' helmet met the definition of a sculpture under the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 10:44 am
For example, Ainsworth v. [read post]
