Search for: "Ainsworth v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In the most high profile intellectual property dispute to reach the Supreme Court to date, the justices were asked in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39, [2011] All ER (D) 257 (Jul) to consider who owns the rights to the storm trooper helmets from the Star Wars films: Mr Ainsworth, a UK designer, or the director George Lucas’ company, Lucasfilm. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In the most high profile intellectual property dispute to reach the Supreme Court to date, the justices were asked in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39, [2011] All ER (D) 257 (Jul) to consider who owns the rights to the storm trooper helmets from the Star Wars films: Mr Ainsworth, a UK designer, or the director George Lucas’ company, Lucasfilm. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
Ainsworth (IP Osgoode) Increase in the number of copyright offenders prosecuted, IP Crime report says (Out-Law.com) (IPKat) Relaxed rules will mean faster patent grants in US and Japan for UK inventors, says IPO (Out-Law.com) Representation in UK trademark oppositions (Solo IP) PCC Page 36: A woeful description of an Octopus: Cautious Co v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
  Cumulating interests – European Court Decision in the OFCOM case: the 11KBW Panopticon blog commentary to the decision in OFCOM v Information Commissioner  (Case C-71/10) A long time ago in a galaxy far, far, away … – Law and Lawyers commentary to the stormtrooper helmet case Lucasfilm Ltd and others v Ainsworth and others[2011] UKSC 39. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: UK Supreme Court: Star Wars helmets did not infringe copyright because they are not art: Lucasfilm v Ainsworth (Out-Law) (Art and Artiface) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Class 99) (IP finance) (IP Whiteboard) (Class 99)   Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Howard Knopf
Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39There are two parts to this decision. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:35 am by tracey
Supreme Court Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher & Ors [2011] UKSC 41 (27 July 2011) Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 38 (27 July 2011) Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40 (27 July 2011) Houldsworth & Anor v Bridge Trustees Ltd & Anor [2011] UKSC 42 (27 July 2011) Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Newspaper… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Mr Ainsworth’s cross-appeal, on the other hand, partly succeeds and partly fails. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]