Search for: "Ainsworth v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Lucasfilm Limited and others (Appellants) v Ainsworth and another (Respondents), heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:06 pm
Assange v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
It may appear obvious that a papercut, as an item of aesthetic appeal, falls under the general header of 'artistic work' - but this sounds dangerously like the “you know it when you see it” ‘elephant test’ condemned by the Supreme Court in 2011 in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am
-v- Ainsworth & Anor. [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, summarized in my article “Not so long ago, in a courtroom not so far away…“), but not all Courts agree: California assumed the personal jurisdiction in Lucasfilm which the Court of Appeal rejected, and more recently the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (on an appeal from the Southern District of New York) suggested, without having to decide, that even the sale of a single item via the Internet could… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Highlights this week included: UK Supreme Court: Star Wars helmets did not infringe copyright because they are not art: Lucasfilm v Ainsworth (Out-Law) (Art and Artiface) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Class 99) (IP finance) (IP Whiteboard) (Class 99) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
Attorneys Louis V. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
For example, in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 the Supreme Court held that acts of copyright infringement in a non-EU country under foreign copyrights can be determined by the English courts. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
Ainsworth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Ainsworth, 22 Barb. 118 (1856). [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:36 am
Ainsworth, 2014 WL 7272405 (S.D. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:10 am
Facebook Inc applied to set aside the orders for its service in the United States, among other things. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Altitude Nines, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:25 am
This decision highlights the importance of considering all forms of intellectual property rights when looking to protect a product, although it remains to be seen whether the UK Court will adopt a similar approach, as cases such as Lucasfilm v Ainsworth, demonstrate their reluctance to protect such utilitarian products through copyright. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
Ainsworth (IP Osgoode) Increase in the number of copyright offenders prosecuted, IP Crime report says (Out-Law.com) (IPKat) Relaxed rules will mean faster patent grants in US and Japan for UK inventors, says IPO (Out-Law.com) Representation in UK trademark oppositions (Solo IP) PCC Page 36: A woeful description of an Octopus: Cautious Co v. [read post]
