Search for: "Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. the United States" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Bias response and the First Amendment The highest-profile case is undoubtedly Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK, vacating certain portions of 45 C.F.R. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum, and Kevin Tobia In Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
C-Air and the Stay Away Settlement Agreement With offices in New York, Miami, and Los Angeles, C-Air Customhouse Brokers-Forwards, Inc. and C-Air International (collectively, “C-Air” or the “Companies”) provide customs brokerage, freight forwarding, and export services to international shippers. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Secondly, Enron decided to write off the Raptor structures and call this massive $544 million expense “an early termination during the third quarter of certain structured finance arrangements with a previously disclosed entity,” and describing the write off in the subsequent earnings phone call as “a non-recurring, non-cash write off of a previously disclosed related party transaction. [read post]