Search for: "Akers v. Akers"
Results 21 - 40
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2019, 8:48 am
Independent Laboratory Employee's Union, Inc v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am
In the leading New York case, Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals noted criticism of what it called Aronson‘s “reasonable doubt threshold of Delaware’s two-fold approach to demand futility” and formulated its own three-part standard: (1) Demand is excused because of futility when a complaint alleges with particularity that a majority of the board of directors is interested in the challenged transaction. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 12:00 pm
Akers and Ronald D. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 3:44 am
In Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:22 am
In Akers v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Goddamn v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:32 am
Akers National Roll operates a manufacturing facility. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:27 am
However, in Akers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am
Court of Appeals in Bellwether Community Credit Union v CUSO Development Co., LLC where, under similar circumstances, the court held that the operating agreement’s terms superseded statutory buyout rights upon the minority member’s withdrawal. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
In Dahlia v. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
” In Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals held: a complaint challenging the excessiveness of director compensation must—to survive a dismissal motion—allege compensation rates excessive on their face or other facts which call into question whether the compensation was fair to the corporation when approved, the good faith of the directors setting those rates, or that the decision to set the compensation could not have been a product of valid… [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
Akers recently published an Article entitled, Estate of Powell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:42 am
Pulse Health LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm
Department of Education and Title IX: “The Office for Civil Rights Is Still Out of Control” [KC Johnson] Mobility penalty: “The residency requirement in Cuomo’s free tuition plan makes a bad idea worse” [Beth Akers] Loyalty oaths? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:10 am
On appeal from [2014] EWCA Civ 1516 The case considered whether, as a matter of English private international law, equitable proprietary rights can be created in assets situated in a country where the lex situs does not recognise or permit the creation of these rights. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
