Search for: "Akers v. Akers"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
On Wednesday it will also hear the appeal of Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group regarding whether, as a matter of English private international law, equitable proprietary rights can be created in assets situated in a country where the lex situs does not recognise or permit the creation of such rights, in particular. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27–28 April 2016. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am
Right of Refusal 10:45- 11:10 AM; 11:15- 11:40 AM; 11:45- 12:10 PM Speakers: Michele Oberholtzer, Director of Tax Foreclosure Prevention, United Community Housing Coalition and Eli Savit, Senior Advisor to Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan Changes in the Detroit Real Estate Market 10:45- 11:10 AM; 11:15- 11:40 AM; 11:45- 12:10 PM Speaker: Joshua Akers, Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban & Regional Studies, University of Michigan-Dearborn … [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
Reversing a lower court’s ruling that a 52-year old employee failed to show that he was laid off on account of his age, the Sixth Circuit found that his supervisor’s explanation about why the company retained a younger employee, in which he stated that he “had an opportunity to bring the next generation in, so that’s what we decided to do,” and that the company had a succession plan where “you bring in younger people, train them, so when the older people leave,… [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 3:44 am
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
” Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
alp v. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Driscoll cites Wandel v. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Driscoll cites Wandel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am
Court of Appeals in Bellwether Community Credit Union v CUSO Development Co., LLC where, under similar circumstances, the court held that the operating agreement’s terms superseded statutory buyout rights upon the minority member’s withdrawal. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
” In Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals held: a complaint challenging the excessiveness of director compensation must—to survive a dismissal motion—allege compensation rates excessive on their face or other facts which call into question whether the compensation was fair to the corporation when approved, the good faith of the directors setting those rates, or that the decision to set the compensation could not have been a product of valid… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am
In the leading New York case, Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals noted criticism of what it called Aronson‘s “reasonable doubt threshold of Delaware’s two-fold approach to demand futility” and formulated its own three-part standard: (1) Demand is excused because of futility when a complaint alleges with particularity that a majority of the board of directors is interested in the challenged transaction. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Goddamn v. [read post]
