Search for: "Akhil Amar"
Results 1 - 20
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
As early as the mid-1990s, Tillman noticed that even textualist scholars, most notably Akhil Reed Amar, treated the Constitution's offices and officers language as if every title meant the exact same thing. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail has already been addressed by our scholarship. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
[Justice Kavanaugh was right. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Indeed, to call it a “too clever by half … cabalistic overreading” (see Michael Dorf, quoting Akhil Amar) might, if anything, give it too much credit. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
“What the Oral Argument Should Have Said”: You can access the new episode of law professor Akhil Reed Amar‘s podcast, “Amarica’s Constitution,” via this link. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The value of Professor Amar’s article was to show how landmark cases built on the principle and how it could generate further insights.Yet Professor Amar recognized that one can take intratextualism too far. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Akhil Amar went justice by justice to explain why it was credible for each one to side with him, in an especially detailed and vivid example of Supreme Court fan fiction. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
It is fair enough to cite Akhil Amar here, but Mitchell has to realize Amar thinks his position is a "gimmick" or worse. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rather, Mitchell's "President is not an officer of the United States" gambit relies on a hyper-formalistic version of what Professor Akhil Amar has called intra-textualism that renders the Constitution a kind of secret decoder ring. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Akhil Amar & Vikram Amar.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution (1/27/24). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:04 am
“The Supreme Court Should Get Out of the Insurrection Business”: Law professor Akhil Reed Amar has this guest essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
The article quotes, among others, Akhil Amar, Mike Luttig, and Will Baude. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
[Note: This is the fifth in a series of essays responding to objections that have been made to enforcing Section Three of the Constitution. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
[1] My fellow Balkinization blogger Mark Tushnet has suggested, and amici Akhil and Vik Amar have argued, that the Court should opt for a fourth option—namely, to affirm the legality of Colorado’s refusal to place Trump’s name on the primary election ballot without deciding the substantive question of his eligibility to be President. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Akhil Amar has returned to this theme in his books. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Say what you will about Donald Trump, he is a prodigious generator of constitutional law. [read post]
