Search for: "Akins v. Texas"
Results 1 - 20
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
The Sydow Firm v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Plaintiffs' argument, that the claims should be reviewed under Texas law, does not mandate a different result (see Camp v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:28 am
In 1998, the Texas Supreme Court stated in Vail v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
In a 2017 decision that upheld a challenge to DAPA by the state of Texas, the Fifth Circuit viewed a grant of deferred action as something akin to an immigration status. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:00 am
Yesterday Howe & Russell and Akin Gump, in conjunction with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, filed this cert. petition, raising a question regarding the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:24 am
Hyder, the Texas Supreme Court held that a royalty delivered into the pipeline or tanks is akin to a royalty delivered “at the wellhead. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:32 am
In Cornerstone Christian Schools v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Deep at the heart of Judge Jerre Smith’s opinion for the Fifth Circuit in Texas v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Sys. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:49 am
Information for Palo Pinto County Insurance Lawyers – The Texas Supreme Court, in 1996, issued an opinion in a case styled, Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 12:41 pm
Cahill, an associate in Akin Gump's DC office. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
In Jefferson County v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 4:14 am
In its Aug. 29 opinion in Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
In the case of Brown v Texas, the People's burden of proof as to the programmatic purpose is derived from the constitutional principle underlying the reasonableness of a suspicionless roadblock stop, i.e., a weighing of the gravity of the public concerns served by the seizure, the degree to which the seizure advances the public interest, and the severity of the interference with individual liberty. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On Tuesday, Akin Gump filed this merits brief on behalf of petitioner Carlos Jimenez in Jimenez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 8:57 am
Some (but not very much) of the attorney’s fees from the original lawsuit are recoverable in a later malpractice action Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
Texas appealed to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
