Search for: "Al Bahlul v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Helen Klein
Meanwhile, the litigation surrounding Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri’s yet-to-be-commenced military commission trial pressed on. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Paul followed up his primer by posting a letter signed by several former high-level national security officials to Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in opposition to the Senator’s proposals to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees to the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:57 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells posted the government’s latest en-banc rehearing petition in Al-Bahlul v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by Staley Smith
Circuit ruling last week, Zoe Bedell presented us an overview of the DC Circuit’s Opinion in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm by Staley Smith, Quinta Jurecic
The United States has previously insisted that the troops in Iraq are stationed there for advisory roles only. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Zoe Bedell
United States, vacating defendant Ali Hamza Suliman al Bahlul’s conviction for inchoate conspiracy. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Circuit’s opinion in al Bahlul v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
This week’s guest was Dan Kaminsky, a cybersecurity researcher:   Wells linked us to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision in al Bahlul v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:23 am by Wells Bennett
§ 950v(b)(25) (2006), and the sentence based on Al Bahlul v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:55 am by Wells Bennett
By now you know: Wednesday morning saw oral argument in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]