Search for: "Al Bingham" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am by David Hart QC
In matters of national security and deployment of the armed forces, it is well know that “the Courts will be very slow to review the exercise of prerogative powers…” and will avoid being drawn“into an area which, in the past, they have entered, if at all, with reluctance and the utmost circumspection” (per Lord Bingham in R v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 19 November 2014, the former Lord Justice of Appeal and current Chairman of IPSO, Sir Alan Moses, gave the annual Bingham Lecture, with the title “Wearing the Mourning Robes of our Illusions: Justice in a Spin” [pdf]  There was a report of the lecture in the Guardian. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Adam Wagner
In Al-Haq, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2009] EWHC 1910 (Admin), the High Court was asked to condemn the 2008/9 Gaza conflict, effectively ruling it unlawful. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
Comedian Al Murray describes the case as “an absurdist operetta”. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
Al-Ameri (FC) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2004) UKHL 4 also offered some support for Mr R, in Lord Bingham’s view that a choice between destitution and another option was not a choice at all. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm by Adam Wagner
Upcoming inquiries include the Al Swaedy Inquiry into allegations of the unlawful killing and mistreatment of Iraqis by British soldiers after the “Battle of Danny Boy” in Iraq in 2004. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am by New Books Script
45 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 29 from 2012: BJ 1531 W44 2012 What matters? [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Barbour, the FDA described violations observed during an inspection from June 19-23 at the firm’s seafood processing facility in Coden, AL. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
Senate Race The Associated Press Republican Norm Coleman filed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging Democrat Al Franken's apparent recount victory in Minnesota's U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
  For the majority, it appears that personal circumstances were not particularly relevant; Lord Bingham in the minority, however, argued (at [39], (3)(b)) that courts should have regard to the occupier’s personal circumstances as part and parcel of the gateway (b) defence. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
In 1972, a 4-1-4 Supreme Court decision said "yes" in federal cases, no in state cases; the Supreme Court will now reconsider it.The case is Ramos v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence  [2008] 1 AC 153  (see in… [read post]
Lord Bingham: an immense voice of authority who came traditionally last in the discussions we have immediately after every hearing; his voice could often sway all previous opinions. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Counterclaims in Investor-State Arbitration LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 8/2011Yaraslau Kryvoi London School of Economics - Law Department Date Posted: August 5, 2011Working Paper Series85 downloadsAbstract: This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal regime governing counterclaims in investor-State disputes. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
A year after it was first announced, the Detainee Inquiry on 6 July published its Protocol and terms of reference. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
And in the same case, Lord Bingham noted that ‘it has been repeatedly and rightly said that what engages the interest of the public may not be material which engages the public interest’. [read post]