Search for: "Alameda County Board of Supervisors"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162: The processing of sequential boundary line adjustments is categorically exempt from CEQA, as long as a discretionary permit is not concurrently processed. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:38 pm
Allied Waste Systems of Alameda County is a dispute over how Allied and the Teamsters Union Local No. 7 handled Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
County of Alameda. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, issue exhaustion under Public Resources Code section 21177, subdivision (e), does not apply to petitioner’s claims when there is inadequate notice necessary to provide an “opportunity for members of the public to raise…objections” to those claims. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281, issue exhaustion under Public Resources Code section 21177, subdivision (e), does not apply to petitioner’s claims when there is inadequate notice necessary to provide an “opportunity for members of the public to raise…objections” to those claims. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
(A131254; 203 Cal.App.4th 656; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10517314.) [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs sued the State Water Resources Control Board (the “Board”), alleging that the board violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) by granting a small domestic use registration to real parties-in-interest without first conducting an environmental review. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
Providing further evidence that California’s complex and far reaching environmental laws sow the seeds of their own destruction, the California Environmental Insider reported in its August 31, 2013 issue that no less than three CEQA lawsuits – all filed in Alameda County Superior Court by groups with wildly divergent interests – have been deployed to challenge Plan Bay Area, the ABAG/MTC Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) recently approved to implement SB 375… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
County of Fresno, S219783. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
County of Fresno, S219783. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
County of Alameda, (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1406: The CEQA Guidelines section 15332 infill exemption only applies to projects within the limits of a city. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 50 (“Green Foothills”); Pub. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
County of Fresno, S219783. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
County of Alameda (2012) 54 Cal.4th 281. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:52 pm
One of the most valuable things we’ve been doing is bringing constituents in each specific district when we go to talk to a council member or a board of supervisors. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The problem is personal for Bill Gates, a member of Maricopa County’s board of supervisors who has repeatedly shared his own experience with threats in Arizona. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
California – Ex-Alameda Supervisor Nabs Lobbying Gig for Mega-Project He Spearheaded MSN – Eliyahu Kamisher (Bay Area News Group) | Published: 6/3/2022 A former Alameda County supervisor who championed some of the East Bay’s biggest transportation projects over his 24 years in public service ended a brief retirement by landing an $197,000 lobbying contract for a multi-billion-dollar rail project he spearheaded during his time in… [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
As Virus Spread, Reports of Trump Administration’s Private Briefings Fueled Sell-Off New York Times – Kate Kelly and Mark Mazzetti | Published: 10/14/2020 On the day President Trump declared the coronavirus was “very much under control,” senior members of the president’s economic team, privately addressing board members of the Hoover Institution, were less confident. [read post]
