Search for: "Alaska, Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe I" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
" Defendants countered that Plaintiffs failed to exhaust their claims, and that the NEPA does not require a federal agency to examine the cumulative effects of its proposed action with those of an unrelated proposal where the proposed action will not affect the resource concerns pressed by the Plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:45 pm by Gideon
A court following in the footsteps of Comstock could easily hold that, as per the decisions in Alaska and Dept’ of Public Safety, civil commitment is a regulatory function undertaken for the safety of the general public, is not a punitive measure and justify it using the following language from Comstock: 2. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Energy Safety Servs., Inc., No. 08-1013ADA - Whether driving is a major life activityo SCOTUS docket hereOakley v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
Should anyone have other relevant cases that can be added, please forward them.Thanks,eAdvocateIssue: Sex Offender Registration:Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. [read post]