Search for: "Alaska v. Graham"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Graham Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Graham Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
., Assoc. of Civilian Technicians v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said any committee member will be free to participate in the Barrett hearing remotely. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 7:40 am
The supreme court in Alaska recently dealt with this issue in the case of Graham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” And Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, “asserted on Sunday that Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Kaushal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
In its conference of June 14, 2018, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act prohibits the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over state, native corporation and private land physically located within the boundaries of the national park system in Alaska; whether a misstatement claim that does not meet the elements set forth in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Frost, 17-949 Issue: Whether the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act prohibits the National Park Service from exercising regulatory control over state, native corporation, and private land physically located within the boundaries of the national park system in Alaska. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:10 am
Graham, 118 N.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 4:24 pm
Under U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 1:29 pm
Circuit Court’s refusal to adjudicate Jaber v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:51 am
" Weaver v Graham 450 U.S. 24, 31 (1981)A civil and regulatory law such as SORA doesn't violate the Ex Post Facto clause unless the challenger can clearly and convincingly show that the civil remedy is really a criminal penalty. [read post]
