Search for: "Alban v. Alban" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2009, 2:18 am
Neary v Governing Body of St Albans Girls’ School and Another Court of Appeal "An over-rigid approach was not required when an employment tribunal was considering an application for relief from sanction, for example, a strike-out founded on breach of an unless order. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:53 am
Neary v Governing Body of St Albans Girls’ School and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1190; [2009] WLR (D) 328 "The line of Employment Appeal Tribunal authority requiring an employment judge, who was considering an application for relief from sanctions, to consider all the factors identified in CPR r 3.9 was overruled. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 2:40 pm by Giles Peaker
I must confess to living in St Albans. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 2:40 pm by Giles Peaker
I must confess to living in St Albans. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am by CLARE MONTGOMERY QC
On 8 November 2017, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of John Haralambous (“JH”) in the case of R (Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:56 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
One, I sat down for an interview with Dan Alban, the lead attorney in Loving et al v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:21 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) St Albans Girls School & Anor v Neary [2009] EWCA Civ 1190 (12 November 2009) Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd v Walker & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1176 (12 November 2009) Patel & Anor v Keles & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1187 (12 November 2009) Twizell & Anor v Entrust & Ors [2009] EWCA [...] [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am by CLARE MONTGOMERY QC
Hargreaves v Powys County Council Trading Standards Department [2015] EWHC 1803 (Admin) confirms that neither the powers of the criminal courts under section 78 of PACE nor the powers of the court under section 59 are a suitable alternative remedy. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 2:32 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
If the answers to these questions were yes, the appeal also considered whether the principles in Tariq v Home Office concerning irreducible minimum disclosure apply to proceedings concerning search warrants. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:10 am by CLARE MONTGOMERY QC, MATRIX
In its judgment, the Supreme Court confirmed that it is implicit in statutory schemes that contemplate ex parte hearings, that is court hearings without notice held in the absence of interested parties, (in this case a Magistrates Court warrant granted under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (“PACE”), s 8), that the court may rely on information that is not disclosed to any interested party after the event, even if that information is vital to explain how and why the court made its… [read post]