Search for: "Ales v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 18,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am by Wells Bennett
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:51 pm by Wells Bennett
 Al-Bahlul’s letter says as follows: Defense counsel quickly followed Al-Bahlul’s letter with a letter of its own, which it filed filed today. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:16 am by Grace Capel
The judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department v Al-Jedda [2013] UKSC 62 was handed down in October. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
Last week at the Guantanamo military commissions, proceedings resumed in the case of alleged USS Cole bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Wells Bennett
We interrupt the week’s Snowden-related coverage with this tiny reminder: at 9 a.m. tomorrow, hearings resume in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:31 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday we flagged two amicus briefs filed on behalf of the petitioner in al-Bahlul v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (Al-Saadoon and Another) v Secretary of State for Defence Court of Appeal “Iraqi detainees held in a United Kingdom internment facility in Iraq on the authority of the local criminal court were not under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:09 am
Regina (Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The complete integrity of public interest immunity certificates and the schedules attached to them, signed by ministers of the Crown, was absolutely essential in all cases in which they were put forward. [read post]