Search for: "Alexander v. Alexander"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 6:14 am
Any error in the Board’s claim construction was harmless and substantial evidence, including the claim language and expert testimony, supported the Board’s findings of motivation to combine (Bot M8 LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:19 am
Shoemaker, https://www.swlaw.edu/sites/default/files/2023-08/Article%206_Shoemaker.pdf · The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:59 am
Shoemaker, https://www.swlaw.edu/sites/default/files/2023-08/Article%206_Shoemaker.pdf The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
Protective letters In the case MyStromer v Revolt Zycling (UPC_CFI_177/2023) the UPC’s local division in Düsseldorf ordered a preliminary injunction, despite the fact that Revolt had filed a protective letter. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 1:29 am
The board’s claim construction and motivation to combine analysis were supported by the record (Shamoon v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:16 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:00 am
Ovarian Cancer – with distant metastases or inoperable or unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration Paraneoplastic Pemphigus Patau Syndrome (Trisomy 13) Pearson Syndrome Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease-Classic Form Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease-Connatal Form Peripheral Nerve Cancer – metastatic or recurrent Peritoneal Mesothelioma Peritoneal Mucinous Carcinomatosis Perry Syndrome Phelan-McDermid Syndrome Pineoblastoma – Childhood Pleural Mesothelioma Pompe… [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
Harvard Law School’s Election Law Clinic filed this amicus brief today, on behalf of Jowei Chen and me, in Alexander v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:44 am
Belkaniya v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:15 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:15 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 3:05 am
Country of origin: new European applications in 2022 v requests for unitary effect On the other hand, proprietors from Asia and the US appear overall less enthusiastic relative to their proportion of European filings. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:43 am
Darrow JJ, Van de Wiele V, Beran D, Kesselheim AS. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:53 am
In Sun Pharma v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 2:42 pm
Alexander, 919 F.3d 847, 852-53 (5th Cir. 2019) (academic speech enjoys First Amendment protection even if it occurs pursuant to a professor's official duties.); DeJohn v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
