Search for: "Alexander v. Louisiana" Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
A ReedSmith team, including our own Eric Alexander, recently won a nifty little summary judgment decision, Schmidt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
BP p.l.c.Case number: 12-cv-2774 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana)Case filed: November 15, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: December 10, 2012 1/4/2013 4/4/2013 2013-8 SEC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:52 am by Emma Durand-Wood
At his Arizona Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog, Lawrence Koplow wrote about Arizona State Hospital v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
  Here I mention only three in addition to Alexander Bickel. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The defendants charged in the superseding indictment and the complaint include collectors, aggregators, and owners and operators of the corrupt distribution companies who were carrying out this scheme in states including New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, Massachusetts, Utah, Nevada, Louisiana, and Alabama. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Raj Chohan
  In a recent per curiam opinion in Alexander v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:45 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Legal marketing expert Lindsay Griffiths of International Lawyers Network on Zen & The Art of Legal Networking Once Again the Louisiana Supremes Reverse Class Certification, Citing Causation as a Problem – Philadelphia lawyer Alexander Nemiroff of Jackson Lewis on their Workplace Privacy, Data Management & Security Report “Future Injury” versus “Fool Me Once” – McNair v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” asked Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, a question that best illustrates how the concept was perceived at the time. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
See, e.g., The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton: Documents and Commentary 811 (Julius Goebel ed. 1981) (reprinting Alexander Hamilton’s defense argument in People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Plaintiffs brought claims for negligence under Louisiana state law and for deliberate indifference based on the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under 42 U.S.C. 1983. [read post]