Search for: "Alexander v. Sharpe" Results 41 - 60 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
And it stands in sharp contrast to the deference Bush has not shown to Trump. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts The trial in the case of Hourani v Thomson concluded on 13 February 2017. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 the Court of Appeal (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) heard the important “serious harm” appeal in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He testified that the sharp edge of the sword came within a few inches of his chest. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
On 9 March 2015, Sharp LJ refused permission to appeal in the case of Contostavlos v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
 There, the Supreme Court emphasized that debate on public issues `may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks’ on politicians. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
“Businesses strive to operate more efficiently in a climate of sharp increases in operating expenses such as electricity and water. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]