Search for: "Alexander v. Sharpe" Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am by legaleaseckut
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:35 am by legaleaseckut
Eden Alexander presents the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 807 N.W.2d 343, 347 (Mich. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Sharp-elbowed political maneuvering there was aplenty; widespread punishment of exuberant expression there was not. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  First, the old Court imposed sharp limits on federalism by a narrow reading of the Commerce Clause. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/LLEIwp (Dean Gonsowski) Court Dismisses Countrywide Data Theft Suit - http://bit.ly/PC4fgK (Justine Gottshall) Crashing the Third Party: Experts Weigh How Far the Government Can Go in Reading Your Email -http://bit.ly/PHUzkO (Richard Brust) Days Five and Six of a Predictive Coding Narrative: Deep into the Weeds and a Computer Mind-meld Moment - http://bit.ly/NMrVLS (Ralph Losey) eDiscovery:  4 Tips for Managing the Document Review… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Inforrm ran several pieces: Case Law: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 – Sara Mansoori News: Axel Springer and Von Hannover – Victory for the Media in the Grand Chamber As reported by the UK Human Rights Blog, the ECHR has rejected an application by Times Newspapers for its conviction for contempt of court… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am by Howard Wasserman
The schedule of panels after the jump (thanks to Lou Mulligan and Jamelle Sharp, the two most recent hosts of the conference) for their help in selecting and organizing the papers. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” asked Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers, a question that best illustrates how the concept was perceived at the time. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts The trial in the case of El-Naschie v Macmillan continued before Mrs Justice Sharp last week. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
Alexander Peukert's chapter, "Individual, multiple and collective ownership of intellectual property rights -- which impact on exclusivity? [read post]