Search for: "Alexander v. State Capital Co." Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
DiMarzio Newmark Knight Frank Capital Group Investment Sales Broker 1 Edward Lombardo Pacific National Bank Commercial Real Estate Finance 3 helen anderson Coldwell Banker Hunt Kennedy Brokerage - Residential 2 Mark Stempel The Riese Organization Vice President of Real Estate 2 Derek Dizhi Huang City Link Realty Inc Associate Broker 3 Ryland Mennell America's Realty LLC Brokerage - Residential 2 Charles Zivancev Corcoran Sales 3 Terry Lawler … [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Beard , No. 06-9002, 06-9003 In a capital-murder case, denial of petition for habeas relief as to defendant's conviction, and grant of relief as to his death sentence, are affirmed where: 1) defendant's Batson claim had been fully considered and properly rejected by state courts; 2) prosecutor's Bruton violations, in which he identified defendant as the party named in a co-defendant's confession, were harmless error; 3) jury instructions were proper;… [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Harry Graver
United States–has been distributed for the October 13 conference, while the other– Alexander v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
Kurzban.Kurzban, Ira J.Washington, DC : American Immigration Council, c2010.ImmigrationKFP81 .P4 NO.6361Immigration law forum 2010[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2010.Intellectual PropertyKF3116 .P34 2010Patent obviousness in the wake of KSR International Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Parker, No. 05-5191 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) invalid waiver of petitioner's right to counsel; 2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; 3) Brady violations; 4) a failure to grant petitioner a separate trial from his co-defendant; 5) a due process violation due to admission of hair-matching evidence; 6) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; 7) denial of a state-court forum… [read post]