Search for: "Alexander v. Unknown" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
Charles has posted Resurrecting the Jurisprudence of Alexander Addison: John Marshall’s Unknown Influence in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1),  and then with United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 11:16 am by Jonathan Bailey
A very similar case, Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games, dealt with the question of tattoos featured in NBA video games. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:45 pm by Harold O'Grady
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1), and then with United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Police Dept., 91 AD2d 898 [1983]; Gearing v Kelly, 15 AD2d 477 [1961]; Matter of O'Grady v City of New York, 164 Misc 2d 171, 173 [1995]; Matter of Spraggins v Current Cab Corp., 127 Misc 2d 774, 775 [1985]), it has also been recognized as an appropriate device for ascertaining the identities of prospective defendants (see Matter of Alexander v Spanierman Gallery, LLC, 33 AD3d 411 [2006];"   "A second mechanism, available when a… [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm by David Post
[It's deja vu, all over again ... ] In July, 1973, Alexander Butterfield, a virtually unknown White House staffer, revealed, in testimony before the Senate Special Watergate Committee, that President Nixon had installed a secret taping system in the White House, and that all of Nixon's conversations were recorded, automatically, on tape. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Well Advantage Limited, Certain Unknown Traders in the Securities of Nexen, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
District Court for the District of Columbia’s opinion in Doe v. [read post]