Search for: "Ali v. U.S. Attorney General" Results 21 - 40 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
After supporters of then-President Trump stormed the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am by Daniel J. Hemel
Likewise for Giuliani: Mayor is a triggering office, and Giuliani also served in two other triggering offices—U.S. associate attorney general and U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
Tate to Acting Attorney General Philip Perlman prompted the adoption of a “restrictive theory” of sovereign immunity. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
And Zainab Ali, Michael Jacobs, Spencer Mcmanus, Susana Herrera and Melody Wong described New Mexico’s ongoing obstacles and preparations for the November general election. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am by Hilary Hurd
After Twitter declined to take down the accounts, Cruz wrote again in May, individually urging Attorney General William Barr and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to investigate Twitter for U.S. sanctions violations and to “enforce any violation through sanctions and by seeking civil and criminal penalties. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Notting Hill Genesis v Ali. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  Digital music services would have us believe that the artist data they can generate helps with routing tours and that benefit makes up fo [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]