Search for: "All Aire Conditioning, Inc. v. City of New York" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
She had to wear her hair and her clothing in a manner in keeping with the “Fox look” and was given specific talking points, questions, and on-air responses. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:17 am by Lorene Park
In another case, the District of Columbia Circuit agreed with the NLRB that CNN was a successor employer to outside contractors that it had for years used to provide technicians to operate the electronic equipment at its New York City and Washington [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
Since the inception of its Washington, D.C., and New York City bureaus, CNN relied on outside contractors to operate the equipment necessary to produce and broadcast the news. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:36 pm by Lorene Park
In the opinion of a federal court in New York, this was more than enough to support a sex discrimination claim (Conforti v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
City of New York, 8 N.Y.3d 888, 889, 832 N.Y.S.2d 871, 864 N.E.2d 1270 (2007) (quoted in San Marco v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> Argument analysis: Michigan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
But the bigger news in Europe was all about links and linking - and all hail Svensson! [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
City of New York 13-842Issue: (1) Whether a claim is ripe when it is predicated on a plaintiff’s potential future injury and mere good faith intent to take steps in fifteen to twenty years that could, depending on a chain of uncertain events, cause the plaintiff to suffer an actual injury some day in the future; and (2) whether the federal oxygenate mandate in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:42 pm by Bexis
City of New York, 35 Misc.3d 1209(A), 950 N.Y.S.2d 723 (table), 2012 WL 1231021 (N.Y. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]