Search for: "All Persons and Entities Claiming Any Interest in Subject Real Property" Results 101 - 120 of 672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2017, 2:30 pm
Like every president to precede him in the last four decades, President Obama placed all his investments in a blind trust, so that he would be unaware of his interests and therefore free of conflicts of interest with respect to the many decisions he might make that could affect his own personal wealth. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The Broughtons argue that irregularities caused a wrongful foreclosure with resulting inadequate consideration and that the entity that foreclosed the property did not have legal authority to do so. [read post]
The Court reasoned that the claims at issue between Jeppson and Ley did not meet the criteria outlined in any of the above categories, thus the Jeppson claims did not constituted issues of public interest. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Backer, Larry Catá, The Cooperative as Proletarian Corporation: Property Rights between Corporation, Cooperatives and Globalization in Cuba. [read post]
While the evidence showed unity of interest and ownership, which is required to invoke the alter ego doctrine, there was insufficient evidence to prove that treating defendants as separate entities would promote injustice. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am by David Adelstein
 However, the real properties at-issue subject to the loan and security interest were the properties Liberty Grande previously transferred to its wholly owned subsidiary, Costa Hollywood Property. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:04 pm by Daniel Shaviro
I personally think that this claim was wildly wrong, but if it was indeed reasonably expected to happen, and within the relevant timeframe, then of course one should consider it.There is a further procedural issue of whether we should allow such claims to affect respectable computations, if we fear that they will be misused. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
As regards ownership of property, there are obvious problems with how that ownership can be balanced with third party interests; how to decide which charity or other body would manage the animal’s ownership on its behalf and in what way? [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 6:43 pm
It is not intended to be, nor should it be interpreted as, comprehensive or as imposing requirements under U.S. law, drawing any legal conclusions about specific fact scenarios regarding particular businesses or entities, or otherwise addressing any particular requirements under applicable law. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
They laid particular emphasis on the purpose of the LLCs as found in the operating agreements, the one stating that the LLC is formed “for the purpose of acquiring a remainder interest” in the Bedford property “and engaging in any and all activities necessary or incidental to the foregoing,” and the other using comparable language as concerns the Manhattan property. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:48 pm
 While MCALA BR § 7-102(b) specifically exempted a list of entities including a trust company, it failed to define any of the entities. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 2:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Background American Realty Capital Properties was a publicly traded real estate investment trust. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
But because the record did not reflect the existence of any similar significant public interest that required the disclosure of Father D's name, the court held that Father D's name must be redacted from any discovery documents that were released. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
(ii) A person is not required by this subparagraph to take steps that the person reasonably believes would be likely to subject any person (other than the person whose conduct gave rise to the forfeiture) to physical danger.(3) (A) With respect to a property interest acquired after the conduct giving rise to the forfeiture has taken place, the term "innocent owner" means a person who, at the time that… [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm by malik11397
We take pride in updating our clients and general readers about all the current trends in legislation in the state of Nevada. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
(pg. 12) - A company employee adjuster, independent adjuster, attorney, investigator, or other persons acting on behalf of an insurer that needs access to an insured or claimant or to the insured property that is the subject of a claim must provide at least 48 hours’ notice to the insured or claimant, public adjuster, or legal representative before scheduling a meeting with the claimant or an onsite inspection of the insured property. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
(4) All insurers shall make a written offer to settle any property damage claim within thirty days after receipt of satisfactory proofs of loss of that claim. [read post]