Search for: "All Persons v. Buie" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2009, 6:43 am
Circuit rejected a defendant's narrow construction of his place of arrest and corresponding adjoining spaces and held that "[i]f an apartment is small enough that all of it immediately adjoins the place of arrest and all of it constitutes a space or spaces from which an attack could be immediately launched, ... then the entire apartment is subject to a limited sweep of places where a person may be found. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Buie says nothing at all about police who conduct an arrest outside of the home. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:05 pm
A protective sweep on conjecture there was a gun inside when the defendant was arrested outside was invalid under Buie. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:20 am
Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990)), has lended its name to the "vehicle frisk" for weapons (Michigan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 12:54 pm
In fact, they had no basis for believing that anyone at all was inside the house, as all of the targets of the investigation had been accounted for. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:38 am
Clearly, Buie requires more than ignorance or a constant assumption that more than one person is present in a residence. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm
Once again, relying on Buie, the Court explained that the justification for a protective sweep is based upon the threat posed by third persons, not the threat posed by the arrestee. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:19 am by SHG
When the Supremes held in Maryland v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
And, the fact remains that all the seized evidence was found in a place where persons could have been hiding. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  That case, State v. [read post]