Search for: "All Plaintiffs Listed in Exhibit A of the Complaint" Results 21 - 40 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2013, 10:59 am by Kurt Opsahl and Mitch Stoltz
But starting sometime in 2013, Malibu's complaints started to go further: Malibu began attaching lists of "other movies not subject to plaintiff’s copyright" allegedly downloaded by the defendant. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
In the complaint, the intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports listed the following counts and requests for redress: •Count I: Violation of Title 47 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:27 am
When a client is served with a complaint from an employee, Meyer immediately looks for the plaintiff on social networking sites, prints everything that's open to the public, saves all pictures, and copies the names of the employee's friends, to see whether any current or former coworkers made the list. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
In addition, the parties stipulated to the admission into evidence of PlaintiffsExhibits 1 through 22, and PlaintiffsExhibits 23 through 25 were admitted into evidence without objection. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:44 am
("On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly: (1) rendered summary judgment against them, as guarantors, despite the plaintiff's having withdrawn the complaint as to them, (2) granted the plaintiff's motions for summary judgment and for foreclosure despite the plaintiff's noncompliance with Practice Book § 17-44, (3) did not require the plaintiff's appraiser to testify and (4) exhibited judicial bias… [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:45 am
" Plaintiff asks for actual damages in excess of $10 million against each defendant, and that such amounts be trebled pursuant to federal and state law.The complaint plus two exhibits (consisting of the defendants' rulebooks) is in excess of fifty pages, and was filed in two parts (Part One and Part Two). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by SHG
Specifically, between 2011 and 2016, nearly all complainants (35 out of 36) were female, and all respondents (36 out of 36) were either listed as male or could be presumed to be male based on the nature of the complaint. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
  The Complaint listed a number of alleged failures, but they all boiled down to the allegation that LabMD “engaged in a number of practices that, taken together, failed to provide reasonable and appropriate security for personal information on its computer networks. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The plaintiffs now seek to certify their class of Illinois consumers who were subjected to the same deceptive and misleading language.ANALYSISSpecifically, the plaintiffs wish to certify the following class:(a) all individuals in Illinois, (b) against whom WPR filed a complaint, (c) containing the language in paragraph 12 of Appendices A-D [in the Second Amended Complaint], (d) which complaint was filed on or after February 3, 2013 and prior to… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In deciding a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court must accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Many of the plaintiff’s allegations in the complaint were based on matters first raised in a short seller report, a consideration about which Mezrahi has concerns, as discussed below. [read post]