Search for: "Allen v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 11:52 pm
Allen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
Allen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:42 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; credibility of witnesses; trial tactics; "In this habeas corpus appeal, the petitioner, Allen S. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 1:58 am
Allen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
Docket No. 07-00295-CV-MEF-WC DANIEL LEE SIEBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus RICHARD ALLEN, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, individually and in his official capacity, GRANTT CULLIVER, Warden, Holman Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama _________________________ (October 24, 2007) 1 Siebert… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service Commission (Trinidad and Tobago), heard 17 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Ctr., 63 NY2d 128, 135; see Matter of Allen v Howe, 84 NY2d 665, 672), i.e., he wanted to hire another correction officer to replace petitioner. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection John Edwards, the Information Commissioner, has opened an investigation into concerns that the Ministry of Justice itself was unlawfully processing barristers’ personal data. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
Rhett Allen Fuller v The Attorney General of Belize, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 22, 2008 Price v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
(And see David Allen Green on The importance of giving important legislation very dull names.) [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published four rulings since our last Round Up: 00006-21 Hackett v Hull Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 04283-21 Friel v thejc.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 05855-21 Duah v metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 3 Harassment (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 07938-21 various v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach –… [read post]