Search for: "Allen v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2020, 9:32 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith, Dean of Libraries at the University of Kansas On March 23, 2020, the Supreme Court announced a decision in one of the three copyright cases before it this term, Allen v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
  Christopher Smith, Plaintiff, represented by Ramona Veronica Ladwig, Kazerouni Law Group, Anthony Patrick Chester, Hyde & Swigart & Seyed Abbas Kazerounian, Kazerouni Law Group APC.Moss Law Firm PC, Defendant, represented by Rebecca Anne Moss, Moss Law Firm PC & Michael Allen Moss, Moss Law Firm PC.MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERSIDNEY A. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Ann Potter Gleason suggests that Allen v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The claimant was successful in all four cases Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – damages of £37,500 Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525 (QB) – damages of £40,000 Burgon v News Group Newspapers [2019] EWHC 195 (QB) – damages of £30,000 Fentiman v Marsh [2019] EWHC 2099 (QB)) – damages of £55,000. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
When Stephanie West Allen sent me the link, I was as appalled at the idea of “tranableism” as could be. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff did not allege “actual, ascertainable damages” incurred by plaintiff’s decedent “as a result of an attorney’s negligence” (Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 177 [1st Dept 2011]; see Humbert v Allen, 89 AD3d 804, 806 [2d Dept 2011]). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff did not allege “actual, ascertainable damages” incurred by plaintiff’s decedent “as a result of an attorney’s negligence” (Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 177 [1st Dept 2011]; see Humbert v Allen, 89 AD3d 804, 806 [2d Dept 2011]). [read post]