Search for: "Alls v. Curry" Results 21 - 40 of 381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2021, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), an attorney who “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” is liable to the injured party for treble damages (see Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636 [2015]; Curry v Dollard, 52 AD3d 642, 644 [2008]). [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:33 am
But one e-mail I received relating to the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision earlier this month in Curry v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm by Robert Kreisman
Campbell’s insurer settled with Berrey for $100,000 but paid all of the policy proceeds to Curry Ice because of Curry’s worker’s compensation lien. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:26 am
  In a recent tax appeal before the Oregon Tax Court, CLP Elements LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm by Sme
Curry County Board of Commissioners (10th Cir., June 25, 2015 -- persuasive) (very brief case upholding Billy's termination, based on failure-to-raise and lower court's "thorough opinions")Armelin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:19 am
Thomas Curry and Jaan Lilles will present the case for the law society.The long-running case stems from Groia’s actions in R. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
  It is the only Shakesepeare play I can think of where the epilogue, instead of trying to curry favor, shakes his fist at you and tells you to bugger off. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm by Buce
  It is the only Shakesepeare play I can think of where the epilogue, instead of trying to curry favor, shakes his fist at you and tells you to bugger off. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:30 pm by Al Saikali
 That is the amount of a settlement proposed in an Unopposed Motion in Support of Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement in Resnick/Curry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 5:36 pm
They all come from the liberal Ninth Circuit U.S. [read post]
4 May 2018, 5:21 am by D. Andrew Quigley
  The California Court of Appeals found the answer to be no under the facts in Curry v. [read post]