Search for: "Allstate Ins. Co. v New Hampshire Ins. Co." Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
As stated by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire when interpreting a policy excluding water loss, "[t]o apply the ensuing loss provision to provide coverage for what is essentially a flood would subvert the intent of the parties" (Bates v Phenix Mut. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:07 am
Co., a February 13 decision by the New Hampshire Supreme Court. [read post]