Search for: "Almanza v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm by B.W. Barnett
 We reverse the court of appeals, which stated that a verdict form is not part of the jury charge and held that if a defendant fails to object to the omission of a 'not guilty' option on the verdict form, she fails to preserve any complaint on appeal.See Jennings v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
We review allegations of jury charge error under the standard enunciated in Almanza v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:03 am
Did the Fifth Court of Appeals wrongly hold that where a defendant states "no objection" to the proposed charge and then complains on appeal about the omission of a lesser-included offense instruction, the Almanza standard applies? [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:01 am
Should an improper verdict form submitted to the jury in this case be subject to the harm analysis described in Almanza v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:47 am
Appellant specifically asserted that the definition of unlawful was an incorrect statement of Texas law and he argued that he had shown some harm as required by Almanza v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:35 pm by Zachary Spilman
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Lieutenant Colonel Paul ALMANZA, Appellees. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:05 am
State: The Court granted the State's petition for review without oral argument in this Hays County assault case on the following issue:Arevalo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:04 am
Should an improper verdict form submitted to the jury in this case be subject to the harm analysis described in Almanza v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by B.W. Barnett
Yesterday the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released it opinion in Tolbert v. [read post]