Search for: "Alvarez v. City of New York"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
It was also established in Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:52 am
City of New York, 559 U. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 pm
The top 3 finalists from the Grand Moot will then have the honor of competing in the New York City Bar’s National Moot Court Competition, and the fourth finalist will compete at the prestigious Dean Jerome Prince Evidence Moot Court Competition. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
” New York v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:21 am
The New York Appellate Division, Third Department, agreed with the defense. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:22 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, the Justices have been reviewing a decision issued in September 2010 by a federal appeals court sitting in New York City. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:08 am
, 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
2021 Virtual Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy: Theme and Program
20 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Gonzalez-Corzo, Lehman College, The City University of New York (CUNY), "Policy Measures to Incentivize Agricultural Production in Cuba after the 8th Party Congress. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:16 pm
Sarah Main, Alex Lowell and Samantha Hazen, will now move on to compete in the New York City Bar’s National Moot Court Competition. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
See, e.g., New York v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:31 pm
A Westchester County Probate Lawyer said it was also established in Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Court of Appeals of New York 2014). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
At the New York Times, Adam Liptak details the issues at stake in the case, highlighting Alvarez's implications for due process. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am
City of New York, 559 U. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co. v Copfer, 48 NY2d 871, 873).Here, Lexington met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562) by submitting, inter alia, an affirmation of an AIGDC attorney who had handled the Eason claim. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
"Once this showing has been made . . . the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action" (id.; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
"Once this showing has been made . . . the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment to produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact which require a trial of the action" (id.; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
See New York v. [read post]
