Search for: "Alvarez v. Ins*" Results 101 - 120 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2018, 1:55 pm
In support of its cross motion, Arch established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating the applicability of an exclusion in Corbel's policy (see Platek v Town of Hamburg, 24 NY3d 688, 694; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324-325). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hospital, 68 NY2d 320, 508 NYS2d 923 [1986]; Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:59 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Alvarez–Perez, 629 F.3d 1053, 1058 (9th Cir.2010) (holding that plea negotiations do not trigger automatic exclusion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)); United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
Alvarez, No. 11-210.Our brief for the Legion of Valor and CJLF is here. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Alvarez, No. 10-CV-8485(KMK), 2011 WL 3667444, at *28 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). "   [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:32 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff also complained about certain practices during Ramadan.In Alvarez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court used the marketplace metaphor to support the first assertion in Alvarez v. [read post]