Search for: "Alvis " Results 81 - 100 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
This could be contrasted with the list of skilled occupations contained in policy guidance considered in Alvi, which the migrant had to satisfy in order for his application to succeed: [24]-[25]. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:38 pm by Eric
Yelp * Two 47 USC 230 Defense Losses--StubHub and Alvi Armani Medical [Photo credit: Bad negative doctor healthcare concept thumbs down man//ShutterStock] [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:14 pm by R. Scott Oswald
Mark Alvis Inc., a trucking company based in Brush Creek, Tennessee, has agreed to pay $30,000 and reinstate a whistleblower who the company allegedly fired because he refused to make an illegal delivery. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:52 am by tracey
“Guidance for caseworkers on deciding applications, responding to legal challenges and reconsideration requests.” Full guidance UK Border Agency, 7th September 2012 Source: www.ukba.homeoffice,gov.uk [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am by Sam Murrant
Secondly, the recent Alvi case clarified the meaning of the word “rule” in immigration law as a response; and finally the RT (Zimbabwe) case established that a person subject to deportation is not to be expected to lie about one’s beliefs (or lack thereof) to avoid persecution. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
For a more detailed analysis of Alvi, see this post by Free Movement here and for its post on the new immigration rules quickly brought in by the UKBA, see here and the UK Immigration Law Blog here. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v Attwood & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 998 (19… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:47 am by tracey
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening):[2012] UKSC 33;  [2012] WLR (D)  211 “Any requirement which, if not satisfied, would lead to an application for leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom being refused, was a rule ‘as to the practice to be followed’ in the administration of the Immigration Act 1971 and therefore had to be laid before Parliament in accordance… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:29 am by Lucy Mair, Guardian Law.
In the case of Alvi [2012] UKSC 33, handed down today, the court struck down a previous attempt by the Home Office to introduce substantive immigration requirements through the back door of policy, guidance or instructions, rather than in the body of the immigration rules themselves. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by tracey
In the case of Alvi [2012] UKSC 33, handed down today, the court struck down a previous attempt by the Home Office to introduce substantive immigration requirements through the back door of policy, guidance or instructions, rather than in the body of the immigration rules themselves. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:17 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
On appeal from [2011] EWCA Civ 681 The case concerned the UK Border Agency’s list of skilled occupations contained in the Occupation Codes of Practice and whether it was part of the Immigration Rules, as the Codes in which the list was set out has not been laid before Parliament under the Immigration Act 1971, s 3(2). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: R (Munir & anor) v SoS for the Home Department, R (Alvi) v SoS for the Home Department, and The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:50 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:38 am by Eric
Hospital * Two 47 USC 230 Defense Losses--StubHub and Alvi Armani Medical * Lifestyle Lift v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]