Search for: "AmBase Corp. v. United States"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2021, 3:34 am
” “Plaintiff’s factual allegations fail to establish that but for defendants’ alleged negligence in not calling the cooperative’s attorney to testify in the Supreme Court action, the attorney’s testimony would have established that the unit was validly transferred to him at a July 1995 closing (see generally Ambase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
Considering certain arguments advanced by a petitioner for a new trial following an adverse decision
12 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The district court's evidentiary rulings.The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said that such ruling are reviewed for abuse of discretion, citing Manley v. [read post]
Considering certain arguments advanced by a petitioner for a new trial following an adverse decision
12 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The district court's evidentiary rulings.The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said that such ruling are reviewed for abuse of discretion, citing Manley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
