Search for: "Amador v. County of Los Angeles"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
City of Los Angeles, 2020 Cal.App. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
County of Los Angeles, supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at pp. 420-421; City of El Monte v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:46 am
Wells Fargo, Case# 09-00860, February 26, 2009 (Los Angeles County Superior Court, California), • Masterton v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
(Citing County of Amador v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
” (Quoting County of Inyo v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
(See County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:30 am
Arnolds Management was a 2nd District opinion, which covers, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for California: UCP of Central California 4224 North Cedar Avenue Fresno, CA 93726-3700 Phone: (559) 221-8272 Fax: (559) 221-9347 E-mail: lauriea@ccucp.org Web: http://www.ccucp.org UCP of Greater Sacramento 191 Lathrop Way, Suite N Sacramento, CA 95815 Phone: (916) 565-7700 Fax: (916) 565-7773 E-mail: ucp@ucpsacto.org Web: http://www.ucpsacto.org UCP of Los Angeles, Ventura & Santa Barbara Counties 6430 Independence… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
City of Los Angeles (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 768. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
While the Agency believes VMT methodology will promote project designs that reduce reliance on automobile travel, this section still permits lead agencies to use discretion when selecting alternative methodologies for determining transportation impacts, including LOS, for projects intended to increase roadway capacity. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows County of Butte v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows County of Butte v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
