Search for: "Amara v. Cigna Corporation"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 7:00 am
The lawyers at Steptoe and Johnson in D.C. say the same thing as John, only with more legalese, commenting that “the Supreme Court’s recent decision in CIGNA Corporation v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:15 am
In Cigna Corporation v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:34 am
Cigna Corporation changed its pension plan back in 1998. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Tuesday, Nov. 30 CIGNA Corporation, et al. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm
In Rosario v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:46 am
Supreme Court reminded us in CIGNA v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:07 am
The class, comprised of 25,000 CIGNA employees, sued the corporation and its pension plan after CIGNA made changes to the plan in 1998. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:57 am
CIGNA Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:03 am
Finally, following Cigna Corporation v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:55 am
17 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
In a 122 page opus on ERISA law (download here), District Court Judge Mark Kravitz has issued a fascinating and thorough decision, Amara v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:30 pm
The Supreme Court in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am
In CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:50 am
Given the importance of these claims in a post-Amara world, the significance of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
CIGNA Corp. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-1012) Issues (partly overlapping among the petitions): (1) Whether a group of corporations can constitute an association-in-fact enterprise under RICO; (2) whether a corporation can be found to have the necessary specific intent to defraud in a RICO case without evidence that any particular individual in the corporation had such specific intent; (3) whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
The decision left it to the Kentucky Supreme Court to explore whether an emergency existed for the specific actions taken in the entry of an apartment in Lexington, Ky., in search of a suspected drug dealer. ** In CIGNA Corp., et al., v. [read post]
