Search for: "Amazon Web Services, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 7:50 am by Vincent LoTempio
Cathas Advanced Technologies LLC is suing Expedia, Apple and Amazon in three different lawsuits for methods and storage mediums regarding communications, Web applications and marketing related services. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Amazon Web Service LLC et al. 07-00787 (D. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:29 am
  Boys World is consistently identified − by streaming services and social, print and web media as the source of BOYS WORLD audio recordings featuring music. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:00 am by brad wilson
JustLegal Marketing LLC has services that will help you, like websites, PPC, SEO, and social media for lawyers. 1. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 7:54 am by Eric
By Eric Goldman Taxes * Amazon.com, LLC v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin., 2010 NY Slip Op 07823 (N.Y. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:38 pm by Guest Author Adonis Hoffman, Esq.
It includes the likes of Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Google, and other OTT Internet services, in addition to pay TV providers such as AT&T, Charter, Comcast, and DISH. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Amazon Web Services, Inc., et al., 21-cv-00270 (King County Case No. 21-2-02856-6 SEA) (Complaint) (Notice of Removal) (Motion to Remand) Previous post on the case: “Court Rejects Parler’s Demand That Amazon Host Its Services“ The post Catching Up on the Parler v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:51 am
Google owns YouTube but YouTube operates as a separate LLC (see the footer of the site). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm by Eric Goldman
(some citations ommitted) See my blog post on the district court ruling, where I explained: The lawsuit involves two competing web services that help college students research options for transferring to other colleges. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
Roommates.Com, LLC, 521 F.3d 1157, 1173–74 (9th Cir. 2008) (In analyzing section 230 immunity, web service provider was not respo [read post]